I had a professor the other day who, tongue in cheek, consulted Wikidpedia live in class while at the same time said “can’t you get thrown out of library school for using Wikidpedia or sumpn’?” LOL.
I like wikidpedia if for no other reason it is extremely easy to search and contains current information. but I am also a healthy skeptic of what I read so taking articles with a grain of salt is nothing new to me. That could potentially be a problem for others but I never felt “at the mercy of web vandals” before. (or email: thank you Snopes.com).
Anyway, while I wouldn’t use wikidpedia to find information about George Bush(presuming it has been vandalized) my Japanese friend told me that the Japanese wikidpedia site has closed down the article on the Japanese flag. this surprised me as I never heard of wikidpedia doing that before.
So I checked the English version but there isn’t even a brief summary of the contention behind it. So I tried Neo-Naziand, while extensive and containing every seeming link to a neo-nazi group, it is still open to editing.
So then I tried Jew and voila! found a closed article.
Incidentally, the George Bush article is also closed. But I think it is important to note that these are only closed to “new” or “unregistered users”. So you certainly can’t make anonymous changes.
Wikidpedia’s openness to editing is its strength and its weakness. I feel it is a good test of community-ability on the web. it will be interesting to see how it fares over the next few years.